|
Current Events and Senior Government
|
|
Archive for ‘American History’ Category
What the Election Would Look Like if it Was Decided by: [Fill In the Blank]This is a pretty neat site that shows us what the Electoral Map would have looked like this year if only women voted, or men, or people over 65, etc, etc, etc. The information is of little practical use – but it’s quite fascinating for you Government junkies! Click here for: Hypothetical Election Maps! According to CNN exit polls, this is what the map would have looked like if voters 65 and older decided the election. It’s too bad for McCain that all those voters under 65 showed up! (kidding)
Congressional Homework: WindowpanesWhat did you think of our congressional simulation? Have your opinions about Congress changed? Here is a summary of your homework due next class. Take some time to make this nice – I’d like to show them off to people around the classroom/school/district. In each box, illustrate the answer using as few words as possible. Make sure that the average person can understand your drawing (without you there to explain it!) Try to put all of the complexity you would put into your writing into your drawings. Divide your paper into six equally sized boxes and fill them in with graphic illustrations as follows in the table below:
Remember, the issue you care most about may actually not the the greatest problem facing the United States right now! Take some time with this fun assignment – don’t slack on it – and you’ll enjoy it. Filibuster: The Next Great American SandwichFilibuster might be a sandwich, but more likely its a ‘stalling tactic’ used by the minority party in the Senate (currently the Republicans) to prevent legislation from passing through the Senate. With 60 votes you can invoke cloture – and end a filibuster. Because of the filibuster 60 votes (rather than a simple majority) are needed in the Senate in order to get any controversial legislation passed. If you don’t have 60 votes and your legislation is controversial – you might as well go home. The filibuster is not mentioned in the United States Constitution, but it is a long running tradition in the Senate. It gives the minority party a significant source of power, despite its minority status. The question is, however, should the minority party be able to wield this kind of power? More people did, in fact, vote for the other party. Currently, the Democrats (along with the two Independents who caucus with them) have 57 58 votes with races in Alaska, Georgia and Minnesota still undecided after November 4th. This COULD lead to 60 Democrats and 40 Republicans. It’s doubtful that the Democrats will be this fortunate, however. Update: Alaska’s seat has been called for the Democrat, Mark Begich. He upset incumbent Republican Ted Stevens Even though the Democrats may not get 60 seats needed for a supermajority – the Republicans still won’t filibuster quite like they (and Democrats) used to. Here’s an article that argues why!
This means that the Democrats only have to pull three Republicans away from their party in order to prevent a filibuster. Only three. In a body where loyalty is rewarded, but not demanded, and in a political climate leaning left, this may not be very difficult. In fact, the Democrats haven’t had 60 votes in the Senate since 1977 and the Republicans (if I do my math correctly) haven’t had a filibuster proof majority since 1923. Back then Robert Byrd (D-WV) was only five years old! Does the Democratic supermajority concern you? After January 20th, the Democrats will control the White House and both Houses of Congress. Is it possible that this is just simply too much power for one party to handle? Update: Politico mulls the idea of a Democratic supermajority
Obama WinsIn case you have been living in a cave and your only source of news is MrOsman.com – Barack Obama will be the 44th President of the United States of America. He landed the 270 (and more) electoral college votes that he needed. Were your electoral college predictions correct?
Bet You Didn’t KnowEven I didn’t know this!!! From takeyourkids2vote.org:
Fascinating! The lesson to be learned in this post is that I told you something incorrect in class: I told you that the election date (the first Tuesday after the first Monday) has been set since the constitution was ratified by the original thirteen colonies. Obviously that’s not correct!
So after I did some historical research on this subject, I got to thinking about election day. Even though Tuesdays made sense for elections in 1845, do they make sense 163 years later? Tuesday, a work day, can be a difficult day for voters to make time to get to the polls. Saturday may be a more advantageous day to have election day. Citizens are less likely to be at work on a Saturday (although a significant amount of the populous does work on weekends) and more likely to be available to vote. In 1845 election day was moved to Tuesday to encourage rural voters to make it in to town to vote. If election day was originally moved to Tuesday to encourage voting, why not move it to a day like Saturday in order to encourage voting? In addition, other than tradition, why do we vote in November? Why not vote the day after taxes are due, April 16th? This would surely encourage a more fiscally responsible government. Or why not vote on July 4th while patriotic spirits are high? Election day on July 4th would surely encourage a higher level of voter participation. Right?
A More Perfect ConstitutionThis week we’ll spend a lot of time talking about how we can change the Constitution. Every year dozens of amendments are proposed to the Constitution an in the entire history (230+ years) of the United States, we’ve only approved 27 amendments. Of those 27, the first 10 (the Bill of Rights) were more like an extension to the original Constitution. In fact, several amendments have been passed by congress and not passed by the states. Obviously its pretty difficult to amend it! However, the Constitution is far from a perfect document. We have an Electoral College that prevents the people from directly electing the President, a Senate that isn’t truly democratic, and a Supreme Court that isn’t democratic at all! Some political scientists even argue that so many Americans are disinterested in the political system because an antiquated Constitution alienates them! If you WERE actually able to amend the Constitution, what would you change? I found a list of recently proposed amendments to the Constitution. Some of the more interesting ones ( along with the Congress that voted them down) are: 109th Congress (2005-2006)
108th Congress (2003-2004)
107th Congress (2001-2002)
106th Congress (1999-2000)
105th Congress (1997-1998)
Sanford Levinson, professor at the University of Texas, says we need to make some significant changes to the Constitution! Larry J. Sabato, professor at the University of Virginia, makes of list of 23 amendments that should be made to the Constitution! Some other interesting ideas:
What do you think? Should we add something new to the Constitution? What should we amend? Or should we simply have another Constitutional Convention and start all over? And remember Thomas Jefferson’s ideas on the Constitution:
Download the assignment (.doc) here: Amending the Constitution activity You will use Microsoft Word, the textbook, and the internet to complete the assignment. I will let you know how to turn the assignment in at the end of class. Do not print it! Take some time, when you’re completed with the assignment, to post some comments on MrOsman.com! (Don’t forget your next test is on Wednesday the 24th) Foundations of American GovernmentHere’s the PowerPoint from Friday. Don’t forget the homework that’s due Tuesday of next week Use the PowerPoint to study, take notes, and review. According to the schedule, the next test will be September 24th/25th so start preparing. I’d like to see SOMEONE get a 100 on this one! Use the link below, or view the PowerPoint below to study. You will need Flashplayer to view – download it here. |